Blög

  • Random
  • Archive
  • RSS
  • Ask me questions
living-on-a-mobius-strip:


Pigs have the comprehension and intelligence of a 4 year old human… they are placed as the 4th most intelligent creatures on Earth (way more intelligent that a cat or a dog).
Owing to this intelligence. pigs are fully aware of their plight… this pig comprehends the horrors it is being forced to endure… the living hell it is being forced to witness…
but like a small child, it can’t understand why…
But, if you could explain it to them, how would you possibly be able to justify it?
What nightmares must be going on in that mind… What sadness lies in those eyes?
It beggars belief.
View Separately

living-on-a-mobius-strip:

Pigs have the comprehension and intelligence of a 4 year old human… they are placed as the 4th most intelligent creatures on Earth (way more intelligent that a cat or a dog).

Owing to this intelligence. pigs are fully aware of their plight… this pig comprehends the horrors it is being forced to endure… the living hell it is being forced to witness…

but like a small child, it can’t understand why…

But, if you could explain it to them, how would you possibly be able to justify it?

What nightmares must be going on in that mind… What sadness lies in those eyes?

It beggars belief.

(via tofujesus)

    • #animal cruelty
    • #animal rights
    • #sad
  • 5 days ago > living-on-a-mobius-strip
  • 212
  • Comments
  • Permalink
  • Share
    Tweet

Militant Vegans vs Militant Pro-Lifers

socio-huxley-campus-trash:

rooddood:

Anyone else notice how similar Anti-Choice and militant Vegan tumblr posters are? Let’s look at some of the similarities.

Read More

“Militant vegans and Anti-Choicers both base their campaigning and arguments around emotional blackmail and anecdotes.”

Actually, unlike anti-choicers, the vegan community tends to use statistics to back up the facts. Such as…

Percentage of corn  in the US eaten by people: 20

Percentage of corn grown in the US eaten by livestock: 80

Percentage of oats grown in the US eaten by livestock: 95

Percentage of protein wasted by cycling grain through livestock: 90

How frequently a child dies as a result of malnutrition: every 2 point 3 seconds

Pounds of potatoes that can be grown on an acre: 40,000

Pounds of beef produced on an acre: 250

Percentage of US farmland devoted to beef production: 56

Pounds of grain and soybeans needed to produce a pound of edible flesh from feedlot beef: 16

Or that over 12 billion animals were killed in the us alone in 2011.

“While a Vegan will post pictures of cute farmyard animals and tell horror stories about animals being treated badly by people, an Anti-Choicer will post pictures of cute babies and tell horror stories about forced abortions and the like.”

But the so called “horror stories” of animal cruelty are real, documented by video and photo every day, and continue as we speak. Unlike an anti-choicer, who uses a BABY (and we all know that babies aren’t even involved in abortion, fetuses and embryos are), vegans are not afraid to show you the real victims of this cruelty. An anti-choicer can’t show you the “real victim”, because all they would have is a small primordial-esque blob, or even a small dot in a petri dish. 

Comparing an embryo or fetus to a living, sentient animal is an insult to the animal. Embryos cannot think or feel - I should think that someone who is adamantly against anti-choicers would know that already. 

“A Vegan will insist you can’t love animals if you eat any of them, and an Anti-Choicer will say you aren’t fit to be a parent if you support the right to an abortion.”

But an “animal lover” claims to love ANIMALS while paying for their death. A good parent doesn’t claim to love embryos. Meanwhile, someone who supports abortion (or the right to it) merely supports the right to choice - do do with one’s own body as need be. You don’t parent a fetus. But you do eat animals. 

“To be blunt, the general claims of both groups are completely untrue. A Vegan will have you believe that humans are purely herbivores, and that animal products are pure carcinogens mixed with gristle and fat”

No, but we will not be sugar-coating it when we show you the obvious links between animal consumption and cancer, heart disease and stroke, among a myriad of other health issues that can be remedied through healthy eating. 

http://www.naturalnews.com/032659_arsenic_chicken.html

http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2009/jul/01/vegetarians-blood-cancer-diet-risk

http://library.thinkquest.org/20922/who_become.htm

Despite there being many studies to show the harms of animal consumption and absolutely NO studies which can show that a fetus can feel pain before roughly 20 weeks, it seems unprecidented that you should make the comparison.

“Vegans, too, are generally well-off, middle class young women who watched a documentary about abattoirs, which taught them everything they knew and instantly elevated them to being the apex of morality.”

I won’t over-refer to my own lack of wealth to prove you  wrong in this regard, so let’s look at some other examples. Although there are many middle class vegans, the majority of vegans I have met along the way have been those who participate in dumpster diving, cut corners in their everyday life just to afford their rent, and always are looking for the cheapest way to be healthy. Many middle class, 20-something white women who are in the image of “veganism” are actually just practicing a plant-based diet for their health. But no, dumpster diving is just something rich people do in their spare time, right?

http://www.thescavenger.net/animals/indigenous-veganism-feminist-natives-do-eat-tofu-237794-504.html

http://www.veganmainstream.com/eating-vegan-on-21-00-a-week-the-food-stamp-budget

(To note, the 21$ a week food stamp budget is more than I spend on food in half a month)

http://vegnews.com/articles/page.do?pageId=4438&catId=5

http://grist.org/food/new-agtivist-bryant-terry-is-inspiring-the-black-community-to-eat-better/

And no, we don’t think we’re the apex of morality - we just think that killing for pleasure is fucked up. If someone were to kill a woman about to get an abortion to feel the pleasure of stopping “baby murder”, you’d probably think they were fucked up too. 

“Both of them seem to think that calling Carnist scum/Pro-choice (A carnist or omni is a slur which means a person with a normal diet, for the uninformed)”

Carnist isn’t actually a slur, it’s an identified term coined by social psychologist Melanie Joy in her book Why We Love Dogs, Eat Pigs, and Wear Cows. Despite it not being a slur, I know that many meat-eaters take it as such and it causes them to create a barrier between what I’m saying and what they want to hear because their feelings may be hurt. I stick to omnivore simply because carnist isn’t a widely noted term yet and it doesn’t help my argument. I don’t see how someone can find “omni”, the short word for omnivore, a slur, if the meat eater believes that they are an omnivore. 

Nor have I ever used the word scum (it needs to disappear from tumblr if you ask me) nor have I seen any vegan use the word scum. 

Also, “omni is a slur which means a person with a normal diet”. That’s as uncalled for as saying “cis is a slur which means a normal woman or man”. 

“people murderers, assholes, idiots or any other insult is going to suddenly make them wake up and think ‘Wow, they’re right! Supporting womens rights/Eating most food DOES make me a massive asshole! I’d better change my thinking patterns to match theirs exactly right away!’ That, and the way they seem to crave validation and buttpats from others within their group. I guess if I was some kook who threw buckets of blood on old ladies fur coats or torched doctors surgeries, I’d want to be backed up by my fellow kooks as well.”

Well, killing animals for pleasure does make someone a murderer, and killing for pleasure does seem like something an asshole would do, but that doesn’t need to be brought up in a clean discussion and rarely is. However, it is frustrating when someone continually compares a sentient being to a non-sentient fetus, and I have a few choice words for that.

Referencing the blood bucketed weirdos of the 90s doesn’t make you culturally relevant, nor does it prove anything. Perhaps we should stick to referencing acts within this decade, or even the last decade for that matter. 

“Last and best, the two groups are united by their twin persecution complexes.”

Last and most important, never unite me with an anti-choicer against my consent. 

“Ironically enough, Militant Vegans generally think a human beings life is worth that of a flea”

Despite the fact that a large portion of the reason to be vegan is for humanitarian purpose? Right. Because you can’t care for non-human animals and humans at the same time, that’s just like, totally way too hard, right?

All this. She knows what she’s talking about; y’all chumps better listen up.

(via soycrates)

    • #veganism
    • #smart rebuttals to idiocy
    • #animal rights
    • #vegan
  • 2 weeks ago > rooddood
  • 58
  • Comments
  • Permalink
  • Share
    Tweet

CLOSE OXFORD UNIVERSITY ANIMAL TORTURE LAB

connerxvx:

Please sign and reblog.

    • #animal rights
    • #animal cruelty
    • #animal liberation
  • 1 month ago > bankston
  • 63
  • Comments
  • Permalink
  • Share
    Tweet
tofujesus:

twisted-thought:

we-are-all-earthlings:

lurid-fragment:

thedailywhat:

For Science of the Day: This lamb may be headed for Die Guillotine, depending on how the Internet votes. Iman Rezai and Rouven Materne, two students at Berlin University of the Arts, decided to “teach the world about democracy in the online world” by building a fluorescent killing machine and planning a possible sacrifice.
The university has called their bluff, insisting the pair won’t actually kill the lamb, but the students seem intent on seeing it through. “There were people who wanted to forbid us to do this. There were people who celebrated the idea from day one. And there were some people who were afraid of us,” Materne said in a video last week.
With 21 days remaining, more than 400,000 people have weighed in, with two-thirds of voters opting to let the lamb alive.
[hypervocal]

what the fuck what the fuck what the fuck

Why are people so fucking stupid.

I’m so fucking infuriated. I hope this poor baby won’t have to die. People should stop all this bullshit once and for all. PLEASE everyone, I urge you to go to the website and please submit the word “NEIN” in the poll. The “JA” (Yes) section is gaining votes…..

i don’t know whether or not this is a giant troll, but i’ve always had nothing but hatred for animal fascists pursuing their sick fantasies under the guise of art. especially when they’re trying to opt out of their responsibility by shifting the blame to the audience, when NO ONE FUCKING ASKED them to set up a scene like that in the first place.
in the mean time. here are their dox:
Iman Rezai Emserstr.50 12051 Berlin +4917639006498 ————————————————————————— Ardavan Rezai Königsberger Str. 39 12207 Berlin
I’m currently trying to get in contact with local animal rights groups about this, might even try getting the law involved. need to get a clear head first…

What is it with artists and sick stunts against animals? I’m all for pushing boundaries and provoking thought, but leave them out of it. If you want to slice your own head off for art, feel free, but a sheep - who isn’t part of the “establishment” you’re trying to shock - doesn’t belong in that guillotine.
View Separately

tofujesus:

twisted-thought:

we-are-all-earthlings:

lurid-fragment:

thedailywhat:

For Science of the Day: This lamb may be headed for Die Guillotine, depending on how the Internet votes. Iman Rezai and Rouven Materne, two students at Berlin University of the Arts, decided to “teach the world about democracy in the online world” by building a fluorescent killing machine and planning a possible sacrifice.

The university has called their bluff, insisting the pair won’t actually kill the lamb, but the students seem intent on seeing it through. “There were people who wanted to forbid us to do this. There were people who celebrated the idea from day one. And there were some people who were afraid of us,” Materne said in a video last week.

With 21 days remaining, more than 400,000 people have weighed in, with two-thirds of voters opting to let the lamb alive.

[hypervocal]

what the fuck what the fuck what the fuck

Why are people so fucking stupid.

I’m so fucking infuriated. I hope this poor baby won’t have to die. People should stop all this bullshit once and for all. PLEASE everyone, I urge you to go to the website and please submit the word “NEIN” in the poll. The “JA” (Yes) section is gaining votes…..

i don’t know whether or not this is a giant troll, but i’ve always had nothing but hatred for animal fascists pursuing their sick fantasies under the guise of art. especially when they’re trying to opt out of their responsibility by shifting the blame to the audience, when NO ONE FUCKING ASKED them to set up a scene like that in the first place.

in the mean time. here are their dox:

Iman Rezai
Emserstr.50
12051 Berlin
+4917639006498
—————————————————————————
Ardavan Rezai
Königsberger Str. 39
12207 Berlin

I’m currently trying to get in contact with local animal rights groups about this, might even try getting the law involved. need to get a clear head first…

What is it with artists and sick stunts against animals? I’m all for pushing boundaries and provoking thought, but leave them out of it. If you want to slice your own head off for art, feel free, but a sheep - who isn’t part of the “establishment” you’re trying to shock - doesn’t belong in that guillotine.

    • #animal cruelty
    • #animal rights
    • #idiots
  • 1 month ago > thedailywhat
  • 482
  • Comments
  • Permalink
  • Share
    Tweet

Why I Care When People Aren't Vegan; An Explanation, Not An Attack.

mynamesjustanoose:

II’ll say this once because I get tired of repeating it, and I’ll say it civilly because I’m actually trying to explain this rather than just attack or put people down, despite what you might think. This is for anyone who asks why I care if other people aren’t vegan. People are entitled to their opinions and choices. You can listen to what music you want to. You can wear what color shirt you want to. You can walk down what street you want to. It goes on and on. The issue with animal consumption is this: It’s not just about you. When you take another’s life or keep them locked in a cage all their life so that you can pull substances out of their body in a tortuous way you’re doing something that affects someone else and infringing on their right to live how they want. I may have never asked a dairy cow if she wanted that life, but common sense would tell me that no one wants to be bred into a life of objectification, pain, and disfigurement that ends ultimately in a violent slaughter. Why is it right to say that someone’s right to kill a cow is alright but not to kill a person? Even still, why is it alright to torture a cow but not a dog? People claim to be so opposed to dog abuse, dog fighting, etc but when terrible things are done to other, similar animals they just say it’s alright. How is the taste you enjoy from a hamburger any more justifiable than the enjoyment some guy you would condemn gets from watching dogs rip eachother apart? I care what you do, when what you do is hurting another. This isn’t extremist, this isn’t militant, this is the same thing you do, but not turning my back on those animals who fell on the wrong side of an arbitrary line in the sand.

    • #vegan
    • #animal rights
  • 1 month ago > mynamesjustanoose
  • 259
  • Comments
  • Permalink
  • Share
    Tweet

This is the customary time when the defendant expresses regret for the crimes they committed, so let me do that because I am not without my regrets. I am here today to be sentenced for my participation in releasing mink from six farms. I regret it was only six. I’m also here today to be sentenced for my participation in the freeing of 8,000 mink from those farms. I regret it was only 8,000. It is my understanding of those farms, only two of them have since shut down. I regret it was only two.

More than anything, I regret my restraint, because whatever damage we did to those businesses, if those farms were left standing, and if one animal was left behind, then it wasn’t enough.

I don’t wish to validate this proceeding by begging for mercy or appealing to the conscience of the court, because I know if this system had a conscience I would not be here, and in my place would be all the butchers, vivisectors, and fur farmers of the world.

Just as I will remain unbowed before this court - who would see me imprisoned for an act of conscience - I will also deny the fur farmers in the room the pleasure of seeing me bow down before them. To those people here whose sheds I may have visited in 1997, let me tell you directly for the first time, it was a pleasure to raid your farms, and to free those animals you held captive. It is to those animals I answer to, not you or this court. I will forever mark those nights on your property as the most rewarding experiences of my life.

And to the farmers or other savages who may read my words in the future and smile at my fate, just remember: we have put more of you in bankruptcy than you have put liberators in prison. Don’t forget that.

Let me thank everyone in the courtroom who came to support me today. It is my last wish before prison that each of you drive to a nearby fur farm, tear down its fence, and open every cage.

That’s all.

Peter Young’s final statement to the court (via hailxseitan)

I know people have differing opinions on what kind of person Peter Young is, and I am in no position to comment on that as I have had little to no interaction with him. But few people can deny how powerful this statement is. If Peter has done no other good, this statement can at least be an inspiration.

(via xunlearnx)

(via tofujesus)

    • #animal rights
  • 2 months ago > mossbraker
  • 71
  • Comments
  • Permalink
  • Share
    Tweet
'\x3ciframe width=\x22500\x22 height=\x22285\x22 src=\x22http://www.youtube.com/embed/jYW-ZrOsZIE?wmode=transparent\x26autohide=1\x26egm=0\x26hd=1\x26iv_load_policy=3\x26modestbranding=1\x26rel=0\x26showinfo=0\x26showsearch=0\x22 frameborder=\x220\x22 allowfullscreen\x3e\x3c/iframe\x3e'

vegansaurus:

What’s better than Ricky Gervais cuddling a cute bunny? I do not know. He’s not vegan, right? Come on Gervais, get on the bus!

Gervais made this video for new organization, Cruelty Free International. Their site looks dope and has a lot of great information. According to them, 80 percent of countries still allow animal testing for cosmetics. Damn. 

They have a page for actions you can take to end cosmetic animal testing, including a link to cruelty free brands. Get on that!

    • #animal cruelty
    • #animal rights
    • #ricky gervais
    • #awesome
  • 2 months ago > vegansaurus
  • 26
  • Comments
  • Permalink
  • Share
    Tweet

Dear friends and fellow activists,

At a time when most animal rights organizations are actively promoting, advocating and rewarding “humane” animal products and farming methods, I am writing to you on behalf of three of the recipients of that mercy.

To the industry, they are known as production units #6, #35, and #67,595. To the “compassionate” consumer, they are known as feel-good labels: “organic dairy”, “rose veal”, “free-range eggs”. To welfare advocates, they are known as “humane alternatives”. To each other, they are known as mother, son, sister, friend. To themselves, they are simply what you and I are to ourselves: a self-aware, self-contained world of subjective experiences, feelings, fears, memories – someone with the absolute certainty that his or her life is worth living.

#6, is a first time mother. She is frantic. Her baby is missing. She is pacing desperately up and down the paddock, bellowing and crying, and calling for her lost boy, fearing the worst, having her fears confirmed. She is one of the thousands of defenseless females born into a quaint, verdant, organic dairy farm. She will spend her entire short life grieving the loss of baby after baby. She will be milked relentlessly through repeated cycles of pregnancies and bereavements. Her only experience of motherhood will be that of a mother’s worst loss. In the prime of her life, her body will give, her spirit will break, her milk “production” will decline, and she will be sent to a horrifying slaughter, along with other grieving, defeated, “spent” mothers like herself.

She is the face of organic milk.

#35 is a two-days old baby, his umbilical chord is still attached, his coat is still slick with birth fluids, his eyes are unfocused, his legs, wobbly. He is crying pitifully for his mother. No one answers. He will live his entire short life an orphan, his only experience of mother love will be one of yearning for it, his only experience of emotional connection, one of absence. Soon, the memory of his mother, her face, her voice, her scent, will fade, but the painful, irrepressible longing for her warmth will still be there. At four months old, he and other orphans like himself will be corralled into trucks and hauled to slaughter. As he will be dragged onto the killing floor, he will still be looking for his mother, still desperately needing her nurturing presence, especially at that dark time when he will be frightened and needing her more than ever in the midst of the terrible sights, and sounds, and scents of death all around him and, in his despair, in his want for a shred of consolation and protection, he, like most baby calves, will try to suckle the fingers of his killers.

He is the face of the “rose” veal we are encouraging “responsible restaurant leaders” to use.

#67,595 is one of the 80,000 birds in a family-owned “free-range” egg facility. She has never seen the sun, or felt the grass under her feet, she has never met her mother. Her eyes are burning with the sting of ammonia fumes, her featherless body is covered with bruises and abrasions, her bones are brittle from the constant drain of egg production, her severed beak is throbbing in pain. She is exhausted, depleted and defeated. After a lifetime of social, psychological, emotional, physical deprivation, she copes by pecking neurotically at phantom targets for hours on end. She is two years old and her life is over. Her egg production has declined, and she will be disposed of by the cheapest means possible – she will be gassed along with the other 80,000 birds in her community. It will take three full work days to finish the job. For two long days, she will hear the sounds and breathe the smells of her sisters being killed in the gas drums outside her shed. On the third day, it will be her turn. She will be grabbed by the legs and taken outdoors for the first time in her life and, like every single one of the 80,000 “spent” hens, like every single one of the 50 billion annual victims of our appetite, she will fight to go on living, and she will accept no explanation and no justification for being robbed of her pathetic only life.

She is the face of the “free-range” eggs we are encouraging college campuses, businesses and consumers to use.

These are the “beneficiaries” of the “humane farming practices” that we, the animals’ defenders, are developing, promoting, and publicly rewarding by encouraging “compassionate” consumers to buy the products of what we know to be nothing but misery. “Humane” practices that, if any of us were forced to endure, none of us would experience as humane.

We, the activists, know that there is no such thing as compassionate, responsible or ethical farming on any scale. We know that the only humane and ethical alternative is vegan living.

Why are so few of us telling the truth? Why are we describing “free-range” products as “humane” when we know the horror such practices inflict on their victims? Why are we lying to the public, and ourselves, that “compassionate” animal farming is anything but a myth, a marketing scheme, a deceptive label? Why are so many of us offering up the lives of animals by encouraging the consumption of their flesh, eggs and milk, when our only duty is to fight for their lives as if they were our own? Why are we promoting the practice of consuming animals when we know it to be brutal, inexcusable, unconscionable and completely unnecessary? Why are we rewarding consumers for demanding more of the the very thing we are struggling to eliminate? Why are we strengthening and rewarding the worlds’ entrenched speciesist assumptions, when our job, our only job, as vegan educators and activists, is to challenge and change those assumptions by offering a new model of thinking about nonhuman animals, a new model of interacting with them, a new practice of living, a new way of being in the world?

Many of us justify our endorsement of “humane” animal products and our pursuit of welfare reforms by saying that the world is not ready to change, that it may never go vegan, that the most we can hope to accomplish in the meantime is to reduce the suffering of today’s doomed animals. But this is not true. This is not a fact. It is a fear – a fear of action, a failure of will, a self- defeating attitude and, ultimately, a self-fulfilling prophesy.

The truth is, the world can change. Indeed, the world has changed many times before, and it has changed in ways that seemed impossible at the time. The truth is, the world will change, but only if we work towards creating that change. It will stay the same if we, the self-proclaimed agents of change, encourage it to stay the same. It will change if all of us tell the whole truth that there is no such thing as humane animal farming, or animal use of any kind, the truth that the only humane alternative is vegan living, the truth that animal farming on any scale is an ethical and environmental disaster, the truth that animals are persons like you and me who happen to be nonhuman and who have the same inherent right to life and liberty as you and I. The truth that vegan living is not a “lifestyle choice”, but a moral imperative.

We can do better. Indeed, we have an obligation to do better.

I invite you to see for yourselves how much can be accomplished when a small group of dedicated activists commits all of its time and resources to vegan education that is consistent with, not undermining of, our ultimate goal – Animal Liberation – and when the Go Vegan message is central to every single one of its communications, from online resources, to printed literature, to ads, demos, and billboards, to outreach events, to the in-depth exploration of farmed animal personhood detailed in the individual portraits published on the Prairie Blog.

On a shoestring budget, with an all-volunteer core of vegan educators who are determined to tell the whole truth about meat, dairy and egg production, a small, grassroots organization like Peaceful Prairie Sanctuary has built something that large, wealthy organizations have not only failed to bring forth, but have consistently undermined through years of anti-vegan advocacy: A vibrant vegan world growing in the middle of the nonvegan world, a place where the animal refugees are regarded and represented as the persons they rightly are, a place where the human residents advocate tirelessly for nothing less than total liberation, a Free State in the heart of the human-subjugated world, a place where the principles of abolition are applied in word, thought, and deed. A vegan enclave whose very presence has already changed the world’s physical, political, psychological and spiritual geography.

I invite you to experience it for yourselves. Join us in our struggle to expand its reach. Help us make it borderless.

Joanna Lucas, Peaceful Prairie Sanctuary

    • #vegan
    • #animal rights
    • #animal cruelty
    • #free range
    • #veal
    • #dairy
    • #cheese
    • #milk
    • #vegetarian
    • #vegetarianism
    • #meat
    • #beef
    • #chicken
  • 3 months ago
  • 15
  • Comments
  • Permalink
  • Share
    Tweet
Religion asks followers to believe things nobody can see, while animal rights advocates ask people to see things nobody wants to believe.
Craig Burton (via kaitlynthevegan)

(via tofujesus)

    • #vegan
    • #animal rights
    • #religion
  • 4 months ago > kaitlynthevegan
  • 252
  • Comments
  • Permalink
  • Share
    Tweet

Tea & Animal Creulty

liz-tea:

The link above is for a list of animal cruelty free tea companies. This is something that is very dear to my heart as a vegetarian of five years and animal lover. There are two great loves in my life - tea and cats, and while it’s adorable to see my little kitten play around with her mice toys I don’t believe there is any fun in playing around with real lives. It was recently brought to my attention that Nestlé the maker of the popular Nestea is a company which conducts, and pays others to conduct, painful and deadly tests on mice and other animals. As explained on PETA’s website, “Nestlé also forced animals to ingest common tea ingredients (green tea extracts, flavonoids, catechins, etc.) to determine their health properties.” There is also a video here that you can watch where the chairperson of Nestlé blatantly states that they do test on animals and they have no intentions of stopping. I’m not going to get into all the reasons why animal testing is completely unnecessary, but I would like to take a moment to say that I am officially boycotting Nestea and I hope that maybe you will too.

A good cause, but the campaign is flawed. For a few reasons:

1) Unilever (Lipton and PG Tips in the UK) have committed to “no animal testing for tea”. Great, now what about all the other animal testing they do? Unilever have profited from animal cruelty for years, and are unlikely to change their tune anytime soon.

2) Cruelty-free for animals is brilliant, but what about all the cruelty to humans on that list? Coca-Cola being a notable example (just a small list of their human rights abuses - there have been books written on the subject), as well as numerous others. It seems strange to condemn Nestea for just their animal rights abuses whilst ignoring those of others.

3) But yes, fuck Nestlé. They’re the Hitler of companies. The HITLER, people.

PETA’s campaigns always seem to get so much wrong - be it targeting one specific company while many others get away with (literally) murder, or exploiting people through sexist campaigns to further their agenda, or some other SIMPLE error. I don’t get it.

(via lady-lotus)

    • #animal rights
    • #human rights
  • 4 months ago > liz-tea
  • 12
  • Comments
  • Permalink
  • Share
    Tweet
← Newer • Older →
Page 1 of 3

About

Avatar I blog because my handwriting is terrible.

Me, Elsewhere

  • @silevitas on Twitter
  • silevitas on Flickr
  • mrwizzle on Last.fm
Vegan Perv-Nerds Take London

Animals Slaughtered Since You've Been on this Page:
0 marine animals
0 chickens
0 ducks
0 pigs
0 rabbits
0 turkeys
0 geese
0 sheep
0 goats
0 cows and calves
0 rodents
0 pigeons and other birds
0 buffaloes
0 dogs
0 cats
0 horses
0 donkeys and mules
0 camels and other camelids
This is a conservative estimate based on 2003 statistics. Source.

  • RSS
  • Random
  • Archive
  • Ask me questions
  • Mobile

Effector Theme by Carlo Franco.

Powered by Tumblr